In an article published in today’s Observer the Royal Holloway spokesperson Helen Coleman repeats the tired old disparagements of the performance of the Classics Department at Royal Holloway that her office has been churning out for months.
Never mind that most of the allegations have been shown to be based on false data. The really staggering point is that the people appointed to ‘manage’ the College think that it behoves them to slag off the College in the national press.
But who or what is ‘the College’? It surely consists of academics and students: its 1985 charter states the objects of the College shall be ‘to promote for the public good education and scholarship’ and ‘to provide instruction leading to degrees of the university, to superintend postgraduate studies and to promote research’. This certainly assumes that ‘the College’ must consist of the people engaged in education and research, which means teachers and students.

In ancient Greece, both tyrants and democratic city-states used heralds as their spokespersons. A successful career as a herald required sacrificing to Hermes (the herald of Zeus), an extremely loud voice and ownership of a trumpet. You could actually compete in the Panhellenic games in heraldry, where the sole criterion seems to be the number of decibels you could produce!

But no ancient Greek democracy would ever dream of hiring a herald to criticise its own work and achievements at the top of his voice to the rest of the world.

You sound like a spoilt child who has thrown her toys out of the pram because people won't do what she wants. I imagine you want to protect your privileged life no matter what the pressures are on your former institution. Quite why you think you should have a right to dictate priorities, or to speak on the university's behalf is beyond me. You are not a good advertisement for HE.
ReplyDelete