One
reason I wrote Aristotle’s Way is that Aristotle’s
wonderfully sensible advice on happiness has not been publicised sufficiently
beyond academia. This would have horrified him. He was the first philosopher we
know of to circulate his ideas in accessible and inexpensive form in order to
reach a general public as well as his official students at the courts
of kings or the Athenian Lyceum.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ccfe/9ccfe58469bc99a28d3d4ff0678fe178f2d0fd05" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19615/19615a05207a7690fed1241dc1ffc5ff5f7b88c9" alt=""
The
ancient discussions of the exoteric works show that they were short, elegantly
written, in dialogue form, used vivid imagery, and were lighter on dense
passages of reasoning than the scholarly treatises which have survived.
They featured fun things like philosophical satyrs and references to the myths
of the Argonauts.
Since
I have this week published a 3,000-word exoteric essay on what we know about
Aristotle’s works for the public, this blog is the equivalent of that summary
on the outside of an exoteric papyrus. You can read it on the Aeon website if
you are interested, thanks to its Philosophy editor Nigel
Warburton.
I
argue there that learning about Aristotle’s exoterica is not just an
interesting exercise: it gives us a dazzling example of how academics can
circulate their ideas in an accessible way. This will also help diminish the
prejudice against specialist scholarship that the anti-intellectuals of our day (who are themselves professional obscurantists) like to whip up. It sets an example not just to philosophers, but scholars in
any discipline whatsoever.
If his Lyceum was submitted to the UK's Research Excellence Framework 2021, Aristotle
would surely get Full Marks for his Impact Case Study (I am wrestling with
writing one for my Advocacy of Classical Subjects in State Schools).
I do hope he would also get the top mark (four star) for being ‘world-leading
in terms of originality, significance and rigour’ for Research Outputs such
as Nicomachean Ethics and Politics. But
you never know. Even Peer Review can be fallible!