One
reason I wrote Aristotle’s Way is that Aristotle’s
wonderfully sensible advice on happiness has not been publicised sufficiently
beyond academia. This would have horrified him. He was the first philosopher we
know of to circulate his ideas in accessible and inexpensive form in order to
reach a general public as well as his official students at the courts
of kings or the Athenian Lyceum.
He called these his ‘exoteric’ works. This means
‘outward-facing’, the opposite of ‘esoteric’ or ‘inward-facing’ (which so
happens to be an anagram of COTERIES). They are the ancient equivalent of
blogposts or articles on free online magazines. We have titles and
a few fragments, although reconstruction is in my view sadly less possible
than some
scholars would like.
The
ancient discussions of the exoteric works show that they were short, elegantly
written, in dialogue form, used vivid imagery, and were lighter on dense
passages of reasoning than the scholarly treatises which have survived.
They featured fun things like philosophical satyrs and references to the myths
of the Argonauts.
They
were studied by shoemakers, travelling businessmen and peasant farmers. The
papyrus rolls in which they were inscribed were portable and could be
read while you waited for your sandals to be mended. They featured even shorter
summaries on their cover so that anyone could get a quick digest of Aristotle’s
views on Plato’s theory of forms (he was not a fan), on the importance of private
partnerships to the community, or on the differences between humans and other
animals.
Since
I have this week published a 3,000-word exoteric essay on what we know about
Aristotle’s works for the public, this blog is the equivalent of that summary
on the outside of an exoteric papyrus. You can read it on the Aeon website if
you are interested, thanks to its Philosophy editor Nigel
Warburton.
I
argue there that learning about Aristotle’s exoterica is not just an
interesting exercise: it gives us a dazzling example of how academics can
circulate their ideas in an accessible way. This will also help diminish the
prejudice against specialist scholarship that the anti-intellectuals of our day (who are themselves professional obscurantists) like to whip up. It sets an example not just to philosophers, but scholars in
any discipline whatsoever.
If his Lyceum was submitted to the UK's Research Excellence Framework 2021, Aristotle
would surely get Full Marks for his Impact Case Study (I am wrestling with
writing one for my Advocacy of Classical Subjects in State Schools).
I do hope he would also get the top mark (four star) for being ‘world-leading
in terms of originality, significance and rigour’ for Research Outputs such
as Nicomachean Ethics and Politics. But
you never know. Even Peer Review can be fallible!