M. Aurelius. Roman Emperor as Emotional Role Model? |
This week I faced attacks by
social media from some (un-Stoically angry) self- styled Stoics. I was invited by the producer
of Radio 3’s Nightwaves to consider
whether the practices advocated by the organisers of ‘Stoic Week 2013’ had
anything to do with what I, as a classicist, understand by ‘Stoicism.’ Also
present were the Stoic Week ‘team member’ Jules Evans, who has written a book
he was keen to promote, and the unfailingly sensible philosophy journalist Mark
Vernon.
I dutifully read the ‘Stoic
Week Handbook’, which recommends a programme of meditation and mindfulness
exercises requiring me-time which, frankly, is the stuff of dreams for any
working mother. I also read many other texts by the ‘Team,’ which is dominated
by psychotherapists but also includes two reputable experts in ancient
philosophy and their PhD students. Most of the reflective practices they
recommend, including cognitive behavioural therapy, would benefit any stressed-out
individual in the 21st century, were she or he child- and work-free enough to find
the time (the elite Stoics Marcus Aurelius and Seneca enjoyed leisure).
But they simply are not Stoic philosophy.
The brilliant translator of Epictetus, Elizabeth Carter, was very concerned that some Stoic ideas were too harsh to be of much use to her 18th-century audience. I believe the Stoic Week team
have not addressed the contradictions involved in transposing into modern
experience the ideology favoured by the ruling class of the ancient Roman
Empire, a slaveholding, patriarchal, centralized dictatorship. I said so.
I do think that authentic ancient
Stoicism still has one crucial idea to offer: some anxiety is constructive,
because it energises you to change things, and some anxiety is unconstructive,
because it concerns things over which you have no control.
But most of ancient
Stoicism was addressed to suppressing animal instincts and emotions, rather than addressing and
dealing with them without shame. This hasn’t been acknowledged by our
neo-Stoic brethren.
I am myself involved in researching the ways that