Promoter of Birds, Badgers and Clarity |
Three cheers for Lord
Krebs! I already liked this reluctant Peer
of the Realm because he opposes badger culling. But this week his lucid brain
has cut through the chaos surrounding Britain’s policy on free-to-view access to journal articles publishing the findings of research which has been supported
by the British taxpayer.
She's in gold but the background is green |
This week the Science
and Technology Committee of the House of Lords, which Krebs chairs, published a report
which slams the bewildering apology for
a ‘policy’ formulated last July by the people who are supposed to be twittering sense on
the top branch of Britain’s intellectual tree, the Research Council UK.
The RCUK had to revise
its ‘policy’ because the government had commissioned Dame Janet Finch to report
on alternative Open Access strategies.
She said you could have (1) a ‘green’ policy (in which all research must
be published online so everyone can read it, but there can be a temporary
embargo of e.g. a year so journals including those published by impoverished learned societies can get subscriptions). Or you could have (2)
a ‘gold’ policy (where the journals are freely available online but academics
or universities now have to give money to the publishers) [yuck]. Or you could have
(3) a ‘hybrid’ one and let chaos prevail.
A Sensible Policy |
I am still waiting to be told whether Dame
Janet chose the colours because her relatives are either greenfinches or
goldfinches, or whether she was picked for the job because of her name.
Is Rylance a bluefinch? |
The
RCUK’s apology for a ‘policy’, to be implemented only 5 weeks from now, was published in
response to Finch under the chairmanship of Professor Rick Rylance (who prefers
to sport blue). It managed to recommend all three at the same time: ‘the Gold option provides the best
way of delivering immediate, non-restricted access to research papers’ but RCUK
is not against the green model and supports a ‘mixed approach to Open Access.’
How much
money are chairpersons of the RCUK paid to promote such conceptual pandemonium?
A rich journal publisher |
But Lord
Krebs, bless him, has signed off the report which simply says that ‘lack of clarity in RCUK
policy and guidance, and the consequent confusion, especially given the
imminent start date of 1 April 2013, are unacceptable.’
I have a theory why Krebs can see the nests so
well in these particular trees. His own research has been into ornithology
and he is regarded as the world leader on bird behaviour. He was never going to
tolerate Rylance confusing two species of finch.