2018
has seen the irruption into the public sphere of longstanding disagreements
within the British Classics education world about the content and purpose of
our courses. If you’re confused, here’s a potted history.
c. 1700 The terms ‘Classics’ and ‘Class’ both
acquired the meanings in English they now bear, ‘study of ancient Greece &
Rome’ and ‘position in socio-economic hierarchy’.
by 1730 Latin and Greek, which are time-consuming
and therefore easy to withhold from working and working-class youngsters, become adopted by all
elite male educational institutions as the preferred curriculum. The use of
Classics in social exclusion and divisive rhetoric is inaugurated.
1944 Butler Education Act brings secondary
and indirectly tertiary education even in Classics to a small proportion of
working-class and lower middle-class students via grammar schools.
by 1955 Courses in Classical Civilisation begin to
be rolled out enthusiastically in non-grammar-non-private-secondary sector by enlightened
educationalists, only to be sneered at by self-styled ‘proper’
Classicists.
Peter Jones |
2010 The Charity Classics for All, at that
time no supporter of Classical Civilisation courses, founded at instigation of
Telegraph / Spectator journalist and former university lecturer Peter Jones.
2017 Advocating Classics Education project is launched to
support teachers of Classical Civilisation and Ancient History as well as those
of classical languages, and works officially and amiably with Classics for All.
2018 Divisions harden COMPLETELY UNNECESSARILY in
response to things commissioned by Peter Jones for the Classics for All
website.
14th May It posts an inflammatory review by Oxonian
Richard Jenkyns (a well-known defender of elite classical values), commissioned
by Peter Jones, of Exeter Uni Professor Neville Morley’s brilliant and progressive
Classics: Why it Matters. Jenkyns writes that the book is ‘an attack on Classics’.
25th May Morley’s calmly inclusive response to Jenkyns’ review is published by Classics for All: ‘it’s not that I
wish to destroy his language-focused approach to Classics, but I do see it as
just one element of a much broader, inclusive and multi-disciplinary approach’.
5th
August One patron of Classics for
All, Boris Johnson, writes in a derogatory way about a small and vulnerable
group of Britons in the Telegraph. Two other patrons, Charlotte Higgins and Natalie Haynes, write to Classics for All to say they will resign as patrons if
Boris Johnson doesn’t. They are also both committed patrons of ACE and often
speak in public about how important Classical Civilisation courses are.
Arlene Holmes-Henderson, one of the editors |
9th October Classics for All Trustees will meet to
discuss What To Do About Boris. Given the line-up of Trustees and their self-descriptions, it is going to be a bumpy ride.
The meeting could decide our subject’s future. Will British Classics entrench itself deeper into the class war after 320 years, or form a united public front? Unity would mean no more disrespecting of either Classical Civilisation courses or any British citizens. This matters. Six nerve-wracking weeks to go.
.
The subject you describe was (and is) defined by its contemporary social and ideological functions, and was shaped (as you suggest) to create and entrench an elite. Neither language based 'classics' or studies in 'classical civilization' exist to develop a proper apprehension of the past, its complexity, and the interactions of classical civilization with other cultures. The real issue is, do we want to continue with a 'fabricated' past, which suits a post-enlightenment agenda, or change the focus? There is plenty of interesting evidence out there.
ReplyDeleteThe subject you describe was (and is) defined by its contemporary social and ideological functions, and was shaped (as you suggest) to create and entrench an elite. Neither language based 'classics' or studies in 'classical civilization' exist to develop a proper apprehension of the past, its complexity, and the interactions of classical civilization with other cultures. The real issue is, do we want to continue with a 'fabricated' past, which suits a post-enlightenment agenda, or change the focus? There is plenty of interesting evidence out there.
ReplyDeleteUseful post, especially for those outside the world of British classics. I find the Boris issue unworthy of the significance (for Classics for All) insisted upon by Haynes and Higgins, as far as I understand it. Hope y'all were able to hold the center, and do keep blogging.
ReplyDelete